Gender Confessions and Postmodern Auto Da-Fé

By Julian Vigo

Transgender politics today function very similarly to auto da-fé where the subject must not only have something to confess, she is obligated to have an identity (religion) as imposed upon her by the current gender orthodoxy. The Draconian tactics used to silence valid critiques of gender identity through the veritable postmodern auto da-fé of our time should make any sentient being – woman and man alike – extremely concerned.

 

trans-featuredOver the past year, one might think that transgender persons were 51% of the population given the enormous media concentration lent to this subject. The focus on identity over the material reality of the body is at an unprecedented high with organisations which instruct people how to be a better “trans ally” and publications which, on a regular basis, admonish women for discussing their bodies by asking them to cease referring to the female body because it is “triggering”. That one speaks of the actuality of salary disparity between men and women in the UK or the rates of sexual violence perpetrated against women often sparks vituperative backlash from the radical right of MRAs (men’s rights advocates). Yet, in recent years there is an even more conservative group of individuals who have lashed out at women and self-declared feminists specifically: transgender rights activists. And their weight in mainstream politics is not negligible nor is it, I believe, coincidental to the waning rights of women to access abortion services in the United States or to the rise in domestic abuse that many women suffer in the UK to include a murder of two women a week in England and Wales at the hands of a current or former partner. While women in some prisons struggle to obtain basic hygiene products, in others women are sent fifty miles away so that they can give “makeovers” to male transgender prisoners, because you know, putting makeup on ourselves is endemic to the hollowed out female condition.

And here is where things get dicy for the identitarians of today, for it simply does not matter if a female identifies as non-binary, gender queer, as a transgender man, or an otherkin – the reality is that the female body is the sole reason why women need access to safe abortions, to proper medical care for pregnancy, and to safe spaces in shelters and prisons. Issues of personal safety are specific to women’s bodies and are highly politicised because of the somatic differences in male and female bodies, because what happens to her body is terms of violence, rape, and reproduction mirrors the social structures of gender which are extremely and uniquely political. That pay decreases when women take over jobs which men formerly dominated, that girls in the UK are experiencing record-high levels of sexual harassment and aggression, that femicide – to include sex-specific abortion – is committed at alarming rates around the planet, that unemployed men tend to spend their time either watching TV or returning to school while unemployed women tend to clean the house and take care of others, or that hackers can receive more jail time than rapists are all social facts which speak to the reality of how sex discrimination functions.

Sadly, the UK Green Party has taken to referring to women as “non-males” in order to appease those whose identity politics seeks to steamroll the very reality of the physical, sexed body. And dare you question that males cannot possibly experience menstruation, not only will you be labelled a “transphobe”, but you will be linked to products which simulate the verboten female menses “proving” that males menstruate. On the American front, the healthcare provider, Planned Parenthood, in response to pressure from the trans lobby, has removed the specificity of pregnancy and menstruation as something women experience. Now “pregnant person” replaces “pregnant woman” and the term “menstruator” is used instead of “woman” in order to “include” transgender men and non-binary persons. The problem here is glaring since how we see ourselves does not define the reality of our oppression, nor the reality of the body. Females get pregnant regardless of how they identify. Were that not the case, women would simply identify their way out of pregnancy, pay inequality, and rape. Reality, however, does not function that way and logomachy cannot change social and physical facts.

  Please login or register to continue reading...

 

author border

julianvigo-webJulian Vigo, PhD, is a public scholar, filmmaker, artist, permaculturalist, and human rights consultant. A specialist in contemporary ethnography, cultural studies, cinema, postcolonial theory, and media and gender studies, she has taught at universities across the world and writes for writes for Truthout, CounterPunch, HK01, a-n, and n.paradoxa. Her latest book is Earthquake in Haiti: The Pornography of Poverty and the Politics of Development (2015). For other articles written by Julian Vigo see: Medium, Endoplasm, and OneWorld. Julian Vigo’s portal is lubellule.com and she can be reached at julian.vigo@gmail.com.

Share This Post

14 Comments - Write a Comment

  1. Excellent analysis. Thank you. I have experienced the unacceptable silencing and name-calling you describe. Gender activists are proving to be very efficient in influencing public policy and politicians. It is easy for them to suggest in a Tweet that to challenge them is not politically correct, and politicians who are not au fait with what’s really going on, fall meekly into line. Or worse still, take up the cudgels, thinking they are being right-on and free-thinking. The next step is to have policy makers, politicians and political activists sit down and take the time to read articles like this, where the regressive force of the gender juggernaut is shown up for what it is. A dangerous attack on the rights of women and girls.

    Reply
  2. I am trying to get to the root of the funding of the trans-lobby. I suspect it’s the MRA and NAMBLA as well as LGBT groups but I cannot find proof. This Orwellian campaign of “women are men and feminists murder trans women with their opinions” has been horrifically effective in creating divisions in feminism. I smell a rat. Have you looked into who’s funding this normalizing of doublespeak nonsense?

    Reply
  3. This is a concise and searing analysis of this strange cultural phenomenon we see going on around us. How have we become so concrete that we believe that the discovery of authenticity dictates drastic alteration of our bodies? Thank you, Dr. Vigo, for writing this.

    Reply
  4. Hello! This post could not be written any better! Reading
    through this post reminds me of my old room mate! He always kept chatting about this.
    I will forward this write-up to him. Pretty sure he
    will have a good read. Thank you for sharing!

    Reply
  5. I do agree with all the ideas youve introduced on youur post.
    They are really convincing and will certainly work.
    Still, the posts are very quick for newbies. May just you please extend them a bit from
    subsequent time? Thanjks for the post.

    Reply
  6. Hmm is anyone else experiencing problems with the images on this
    blog loading? I’m trying to figure out if its a problem on my end or
    if it’s the blog. Any feed-back would be greatly appreciated.

    Reply
  7. I and also my pals happened to be reading through the excellent procedures found on your web blog then then I got an awful feeling I never expressed respect to you for those secrets. All the ladies had been consequently happy to study them and have now definitely been tapping into them. I appreciate you for genuinely quite accommodating as well as for settling on this form of exceptional subject matter millions of individuals are really needing to know about. My very own honest regret for not saying thanks to sooner.

    Reply

Post Comment